![]() |
| Home Volunteer Opportunities About BCNA |
Calendar General Interest Contact Us |
Education Publications and Research Join BCNA |
Related Links & Resources Government Contacts Newsletters |
BCNA Ecosystem Plan 20+ Years LaterThis is the first in a series of articles that explores the evolution of the Ecosystem Plan and the current status of the core preserves and habitat connectors. As BCNA is nearing its 25-year anniversary, it seems appropriate to take a look at some of the long-term projects that have helped define the organization. One of the first volunteer projects undertaken by members of BCNA in the early 1980s was to assist The result was the designation of critical wildlife habitats, rare plants, and critical plant associations within the county. But much of this is what ecologists would term a “fine filter” approach to land protection. Mike Figgs had the idea of adding a new designation to the County’s plan: larger blocks of land called “Environmental Conservation Areas” (ECAs) that tried to capture the needs of wide-ranging animals and accommodate natural disturbance processes. Three ECAs were designated in this Comprehensive Plan update, all located in the foothills. Though the County update was completed, the idea of looking at larger blocks of land for protection was intriguing. The emerging fields of conservation biology and landscape ecology were broadening conservation efforts away from small sites often based on a single species towards recognition of landscapes and processes that maintained biodiversity, what ecologists call the “coarse filter”. Roz McClellan, then the director of the CU Environmental Center, organized several symposiums that brought in noted ecologists such as Reed Noss and George Wuerthner. They were inspirational and accelerated the learning curve. A few years later, in the mid-1980s, BCNA mapped a countywide system of habitat core areas that were felt to be the “best of what is left” in the county. Riparian and large-mammal movement corridors connected the core areas. The relatively natural areas of the landscape needed to remain as such, and interconnected to allow for the movement of species. The “Ecosystem Plan,” as it was commonly called, is shown on the map that follows. BCNA used the plan to influence public land acquisition and management as well as foster private land preservation through the actions of landowners and land trusts. BCNA formed its own land trust, the Boulder County Land Trust. During the 1990s, three events occurred that helped achieve much of the land use plan envisioned. The first was the passing of the County Open Space sales tax in November 1993. This allowed the County to acquire fairly significant chunks of the landscape rather than scattered, isolated parcels. Lands protected around The second event was the formal inclusion of the Ecosystem Plan into the The third event was the update of the Arapaho and Now, mind you, whatever joy felt from the success is offset by the realities of the landscape that Wide-ranging mammals, such as pronghorn and buffalo, will never be a viable part of the plains. Even the long-term existence of prairie dogs will be tested. As the saying goes, the price of an ecological education is to live in a world of wounds. But that knowledge also gives an understanding of what you have where you live. The magnificence, complexity, uniqueness, and beauty of our local organisms, communities, and ecosystems are astounding. You have to fight for what you have. It is home. That is what BCNA has been about! The articles that follow look at the individual core areas and connectors in detail. The map below is a key to locating the areas described in the succeeding articles. Click on the map to view a full page width PDF of the map. -Dave Hallock |
B.C.N.A. |
|